Blog
Eminent Domain: The Case for Liberty-Minded Public Officials
January 10, 2010
I do not pretend to be a lawyer. While many of my friends in undergrad chose to enter the legal arena, I chose the second least honorable field: politics. If you think about it, law and politics are inseparably woven together. Many lawyers become politicians and many politicians need lawyers. I promise I’ll end the sarcasm here (maybe).
Among the myriad of legal issues in the United States today, there are few as politically charged as the subject of eminent domain. In layman’s terms, eminent domain is the act of government seizing private property when efforts to purchase the property from the owner have failed. There can be many reasons for eminent domain, usually for the purpose of public use (utilities, roads, national defense, “economic development,” etc.), often loosely defined. This article gives a good overview of the process.
The issue of eminent domain made headlines in 2005 when the Supreme Court decided in the 5-4 Kelo v. City of New London that it was acceptable for the city to seize private property (after negotiations to purchase the properties failed) for the purpose of selling that property to developers to redevelop an blighted (in the city’s eyes) part of town.
The case is particularly important to me because New London, CT is my hometown. I remember as a teenager reading and watching the debates between private citizens and the unelected New London Development Corporation (a quasi-public entity who received the funds from the sale) and how the City of New London ignored the rights of property owners in favor of a dream of becoming “the next Baltimore.” In case you were wondering, Pfizer, the pharmaceutical giant who benefited the most from the eminent domain recently decided to vacate their New London complex after a merger with Wyeth.
This was not the only time New London ran after dollar signs. In the mid 1990s, the New London Zoning Board told my parents who had founded a small Assemblies of God church in the downtown that they could not buy any property in the city because “there were enough churches in New London.” Never mind that such a decision violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, and probably the then recently passed Religious Freedom Restoration Act (1993). The city was in desperate need of tax revenues for its pet projects and they despised the fact that churches were tax-exempt (as they should be). Today the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 specifically protects churches against the abuses of activist zoning boards and where there is still abuse, organizations like The Beckett Fund, Alliance Defense Fund and American Center for Law and Justice continue to win case after case in favor of religious assemblies.
Despite 43 states passing laws attempting to limit the effects of Kelo, local governments seem emboldened by the Supreme Court case. In a January 4 column, George Will in the Washington Post wrote an op-ed about ongoing abuses in New York. In one case, developers are trying to define condos worth close to $600,000 as blighted in effort to pave the way for a multi-billion dollar development project (including a new home for the New Jersey Nets – do not get me started on taxpayer subsidies for private stadiums). The New York Supreme Court sided with the developers in a 6-1 decision.
Will also talks about a Columbia University attempt to expand, but was resisted by local businesses that did not want to close their doors. The university tried to have to properties seized by the city of Manhattan by defining the properties as blighted. Thankfully a state court held in favor of the taxpayers in this one.
The abuse isn’t just limited to New York.
- In Washington, property owners are fighting against Sea Tac who wants their land as part of a light rail line. The owners paid over $10 million for the property, but are being offered only $8.6 million. Now the city wants to claim the land via eminent domain.
- In Florida, a man is charging the government with deliberately lowering the value of his property in order to offer less to homeowners when the government wanted to expand the size of Everglades National Park.
- In St. Louis, the city is letting private developers clear out traditional African-American communities in order to redevelop the part of the city in the developer’s vision.
- In Corona, California the city has extended their eminent domain authority by twelve years in a move that could affect businesses across the city.
What does this mean for ordinary citizens like us? Politicians that do not respect the Constitution rule of law and natural rights are going to be more likely to abuse the practice of eminent domain, if they decide to use it at all. Conservatives and libertarians can hash out if there is such thing as a need for eminent domain. My purpose is not to solve that debate. What is clear, however, is that eminent domain abuses are on the rise and it is an issue that every voter should consider when electing local officials.
The need is great for public officials that do err on the side of the people and not special interests or bloated bureaucracies. The stakes are high when you consider the kind of authority local governments exercise when it comes to eminent domain, but they become all the more high when you consider that many of these abusers of the public trust become candidates for higher office. The same attitudes in Congress today are reflected in many City Councils and Town and County Commissions: the politician knows best and there’s nothing you can do to stop me. Thankfully neither is true, particularly the latter. All it takes is a few voters that care and a few good candidates to run.
WOW! I am amazed! You have done a great job in creating this website. I will be sharing for sure.
Let’s get started right – Less Talk – More Action
Find real Solutions – not rehash problems
We know the problems – so how do we fix them? The U.S. government is too mighty and powerful to defeat and their total unity to thwart all attempts of protest, political change, secession or separation will never be overcome. How can we free ourselves from the tyranny and terror that is now thrust upon us by the U.S. government (and tyrannical government at all levels)? Can you secede or separate from a city town county or state? – NO. What if the U.S. was petitioned to dissolve the federal government? It would fail. It would be impossible to secede or separate from U.S. rule. You can’t secede or separate from a state, county or town. Would violence or taking up arms work? NO. Our hands are tied and there is no hope for an immediate or short-term possibility to regain – re-found America. It Takes A Village; Start; A small village could …….. (more available upon request)
There is a plan ……. (more upon request)
Let’s talk one on one – Start small – think Big – we will have the way to win….. (more upon request)
I am not a radical or a crackpot. I just long to be free and to be amongst others with the same desire and courage to be set free. I am a selfless follower looking to be led by selfless leaders. Are there willing souls to lead?
Or is there anything I can do to join you? Contact: albel1@aol.com
Al, I have just the idea for you. It is not near as difficult as you may think. We do not need to take up arms to be free from tyranny. We do not need to petition the federal government to dissolve itself. We do not need to secede.
We do not need to do these things, because we live in a free country. Many soldiers and veterans (myself included) have fought to give us that and to keep us free. So, every few years we have elections. This is the chance for the American people to decide what they want and who they want to lead them. It is during these elections that as Americans we can exercise our freedoms to their fullest extent. There is nothing tyrannical about our great nation. Those in positions of leadership were placed there by “We the People.”
Doug, I was so surprised to find out you were from New London! I followed that case fairly closely. Amazing! Thanks for your work at American Majority – Ned is so blessed to have you by his side! May God bless the American Majority team with POWER from on high to accomplish HIS purposes! I feel so excited to see the “WONDERS” He is going to perform through American Majority!! God Bless!
Thanks Corene! And thank you for the comments everyone. I think eminent domain is an issue that requires vigilance and active citizens. Many states and municipalities have already passed provisions that do protect the property owner, but of course, there is still a ways to go.
A couple resources:
https://www.castlecoalition.org/
https://reason.org/areas/topic/290.html
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by AM's Austin James, hondapcgirl and Douglas Price, SueMolyneux. SueMolyneux said: RT @DouglasPrice: Eminent Domain: The Case for Liberty-Minded Public Officials https://is.gd/62Hiv #tcot #majority […]
Were You Satisfied with Candidate or California Results in 2008? Then perhaps we should examine the possibility that online activism simply is not enough. Perhaps we should seriously examine the possibility that the only way to have strong candidates who can win, and the only way to have a party machine that serves our needs is to step up and assume the most powerful political position in the country: member of the Central Committee for the party in your area.
Chances are good that that position may be vacant in your area and you can easily be seated.
For the go-to how-to in California, visit Precinct California – you will find other activists who are taking over the party by assuming thei9r seat on their local committee. This is strictly workspace on how to do it – our very first link is a single page how-to document that will work in your county. Do more than just blog – take control.
Tomorrow is the Big Day in CA: the ‘Invisible’ Tea Party
Tomorrow’s Tea Party will only be visible to the folks who happen to be at the county Registrar’s office in your local county. Yes, tomorrow, Tues. Feb 16, 2010 is the day the tea party rebellion begins in earnest in CA.
All across the state of CA, people like you will be appearing before the clerks at the registrar’s office filing for a seat on your local Central Committee. You will be placing your feet on the path toward becoming the most powerful official in US politics.
Please be sure to visit and post a blog entry (every member has their own blog there which appears on the site’s opening page) about your experience at the county registrar’s office. Since there will probably be a line at the registrar’s office, blog about your experience chatting with people (other candidates) in line with you! (We’d love for you to blog at nationalprecinctalliance.org however the blogging resources are not up and running there yet, so we invite you to blog at the CA specific site instead: https://precincts.ning.com).
Please share what you learn at the clerk’s office! We need to hear about your victories, as well as any obstacles you may have encountered. What you learn in your county will go a LONG WAY toward helping folks in other counties, so be sure to post about your experiences.
Finally, be sure to have a few dollars in your pocket to purchase ‘street indexes’ of your area when you file and pick up your petitions. These ‘street indexes serve two purposes: first, they lead you directly to the households of party members who can sign your petition. Second. they are a copy of the voter’s individual voter registration – be sure that they sign with the same name and street address on the street index or the signature could get tossed and you will have to get more signatures to replace them.
Remember, the clerks use ‘statistical methods’ to check petition signature forms – if they identify only 2 or 3 invalid signatures on a given petition form, the entire petition form gets tossed out. Be accurate! To be safe, be sure to get 40 signatures, not the minimum 20 signatures.
Good luck, and here’s to taking over the country, one precinct at a time!
Ron Robinson
CA Chair
National Precinct Alliance